Decision Intelligence Risk Scoring Model
Manual risk review was difficult to reproduce because evidence, criteria, and reviewer judgment were not presented in one place.
Client type
Operational team reviewing recurring risk cases
Previous process
Reviewers assembled records manually and applied judgment without a consistent evidence summary or review status.
Evidence sources
- Dated operational records
- Historical outcomes
- Reviewer decisions
- Data-quality checks
Implementation
Pristone built a review workflow that connected dated evidence to an explainable score, surfaced missing information, and preserved human approval.
What it can claim
The system can show which recorded signals contributed to a review priority and which evidence is missing.
What it cannot claim
The score must not be presented as certainty, a causal conclusion, or a substitute for accountable human review.
Human review
A designated reviewer confirms the evidence, checks exceptions, and records the final disposition.
Measured outcome and status
Internal reference implementation. No externally validated performance or economic outcome is published.
Internal reference implementationStart with the decision—not an unsupported promise.
A Decision Audit defines the workflow, evidence, gaps, human oversight, and success measure before a pilot begins.
Book a Decision Audit